James W. Lucas | Jonathan Neville
By Means of the Urim & Thummim
By Means of the Urim & Thummim
Restoring Translation to the Restoration
DID JOSEPH SMITH TRANSLATE THE BOOK OF MORMON OR NOT?
Was Joseph Smith an uneducated farm boy who merely read words off a stone, or was he a divinely-prepared prophet who translated ancient characters etched into thin metal plates?
Drawing on modern translation scholarship and technology, the authors propose an innovative model for the translation process which corroborates and supports what Joseph and Oliver said from the beginning; that Joseph Smith translated the text using the Nephite interpreters.
- - - Praise for the book from LDS Historians - - -Ā
Lucas and Neville's By Means of the Urim & Thummim is a substantial contribution to the translation debates that have roiled Book of Mormon scholarship for the past twenty years. It is conservative in that it restores the preeminent role of the Urim and Thummim in the translation process and virtually erases the seer stone from the story. It also proposes a translation theory of its own that preserves the importance of the Urim and Thummim and yet accounts for the presence of language from Joseph Smith's world. All readers who take the translation debates seriously must reckon with this book.
āRichard Lyman Bushman, author of Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling. Gouverneur Morris Professor Emeritus of History, Columbia University
Lawyers James W. Lucas and Jonathan E. Neville convincingly offer new approaches to the evidence, explore previously overlooked evidence, and propose a new model for the translation process which corroborates and supports what Joseph affirmed that he, "by the gift and power of God, ... translated the Book of Mormon from hieroglyphics."
āRichard Dilworth Rust, Professor Emeritus of English, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Two celebrated authors attempt to solve the question of the Book of Mormon translation processāUrim and Thummim or seer stone. I recommend a thorough examination of their scholarly work and academic approach to this important question.
āSusan Easton Black, Emeritus Professor, Church History and Doctrine, Brigham Young University